Dear Bloggers

by 32poems on May 5, 2005

I’m curious what affect blogging, if any, has had on your writing. Do you write more now that you blog? Have you met people who told you about opportunities you may not have known about otherwise? Let us know…

{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

Suzanne May 5, 2005 at 9:42 am

The best thing I’ve come across by blogging is FreeCycle! *lol* Just a quick note to thank you for mentioning the site, it’s great. Have a great time in Costa Rica. :-)

David Vincenti May 5, 2005 at 2:02 pm

The blog has provided me an impetus to stay current on other people’s writing (blog and non blog, poetry and prose about poetry), which has expanded my poetry universe. Since my head seems to be more full of words, words have, in fact, fallen to paper more frequently, usually in spurts (like after a particularly good argument in someone’s comments section gets my energy up).

Regarding opportunities – I’ve “met” people who’ve graciously corresponded with me on different subjects, and of course I’ve had a chance to wiggle my way onto the inside cover of 32 Poems….

the machinist May 5, 2005 at 5:00 pm

Mine’s not the most educational nor interesting, but I’ve gotten a chance to develop another community (can’t have too many of those). Plus, I’ve gotten to meet some great people and have more than my share of fun.

Anne May 5, 2005 at 6:31 pm

I’ve only met one fellow blogger in real life (so far!) — for me the main positive effect has been the reassurance that other people share some of my odd little writing-related obsessions and that I’m not alone in doing things like spending hours fretting over a chapbook manuscript. I’ve also been pointed in the direction of a lot of fine poets (bloggers themselves as well as poets they’ve recommended), many of whom I might not have stumbled across otherwise.

Charles May 6, 2005 at 11:54 am

I definitely write more because of blogging. I’m constantly inspired by or interested in what people are writing, reading, writing about, thinking about, and it gives me a chance to write about the things that are sticking in my brain and hear other perspectives.

I’ve gotten to know interesting people, people I respect and admire…it’s all around good stuff.

Peter May 6, 2005 at 6:02 pm

Met people/opportunities?: Definitely have met new people: both in person and virtually. Fine poets and fun persons all. Not really any new “opportunities” . . . yet; but I’m not sure I’m looking for that.

Writing more/less?: Writing about the same amount of new poems, I guess. But definitely writing less in my personal journal; I just don’t seem to have as much to say to myself anymore. hehehe.

Peter May 6, 2005 at 6:03 pm

PS: Got my issue of 32 Poems today. Thanks for resending it!

Laurel May 8, 2005 at 7:20 am

HUGE EFFECT!

I’ve written poems I’d never have written (like a google-search-goal-oriented “Naked Britney Spears poem” which another blogger then solicited for a mag.

I’ve been solicited by other mags.

But mostly, I’ve just written a shit-ton and been introduced to work I’d never have read otherwise.

And then I have this “topic project”, which is an entire blog-assignment page, meant to allow online folks to set themselves regualr writing tasks, push them a little. It’s a great community and has kept me writing when I didn’t “want to”.

http://topicproject.com/

nolapoet May 10, 2005 at 3:14 pm

It’s good in that it sucks me into realizing, what otherwise would be good intentions about keeping, a journal of sorts. It’s more public than a real journal, mostly just an attempt to make substantive conversation.

It’s bad in that it drags me off into side discussions of politics and the local poetry scene, which is not, in the end, the same as writing poetry. In this, it can be as bad a black hole for timewasting as, say, television.

I have no desire to blog poems. I publish infrequently on purpose: I don’t want to put unrealized stuff out there.

Anything I blog is 100% subject to change at any time.

nolapoet May 10, 2005 at 3:17 pm

Oh, one other thing. It did lead to a pending print article, but the blog version is far, far weaker than the print piece. It’s just too easy to fire off a piece that’s not yet fully developed or proofread (see first sentence of previous post).

Glenn Ingersoll May 10, 2005 at 9:55 pm

Blogging for me started out as an extension of my personal journal. But that didn’t really work. So I stopped for a few months.

When I started the blog up again I decided to use the blog as an excuse to revisit my archive. (I even started a second blog to trace my reading life.) I’ve surprised myself by enjoying revising online. I post an old poem (I’ve lately been choosing poems more than 20 years old) then subject the poem to various changes. Doing it on the blog really helps with the motivation. Although my audience is still largely imaginary, the poem feels exposed and since it’s exposed, since it’s standing out there in public naked, I want it to be an unembarrassed naked so I distract it by putting it through a series of dance moves. After awhile it gets to dancing on its own, then I forget all about who might be watching and just sit there entranced. Yes, I’ve revised lots of poems over the years, but this is the first method that has kept me at a poem that was initially unpromising, a poem that I had no idea how to fix.

David Vincenti May 11, 2005 at 6:09 am

Robin said: “It’s just too easy to fire off a piece that’s not yet fully developed or proofread (see first sentence of previous post)”.

Is this a good thing or a bad thing? For example: I have an article idea kicking around in my head. I want to know if it has enough juice to be of interest to the literary community. So I toss out the lede and one of my contributing points and see who bites (comments, topic appearing on othe blogs…). Then I can use that immediate feedback to decide whether to work on the article.

Good idea or bad idea?

MC_Gizza_Tab May 11, 2005 at 7:32 am

Since finding blogger.com i’ve been writing loads of stuff….some poems…some rants and other general stuff. If anyone is reading this i’d be honoured for any feedback on my work thanks for your time

Gilbert Koh May 12, 2005 at 3:43 am

Poems are useless if they stay in your hard disk or private notebook.

Poems are meant to be read. They’re meant to be shared. They need readers.

And while some of my poems get published here and there in the real world, my blog remains the one place where I can publish ANY of my poems, any time that I please.

nolapoet May 12, 2005 at 6:25 am

I feel that publishing poems is useless unles they are a) finished or as close to it as one can get, or b) being actively workshopped online or c) published for the sake of the poet who wants to say, “I published something.”

I’m no advocate of self-censorship. I just think that (in general) blogs are a neither fish nor fowl thing, neither largely-private journal nor truly public forum, with a very few exceptions for heavy traffic.

There’s a little something prurient in reading other people’s journals. I don’t like the blogs that are endless “Today I came home and fed the cat after my statistics class” accountings of time. I prefer the ones that are more like open conversations at a cafe’ or on a sidewalk (like this). These seem more to be e-mail threads with print/digital layout sensibilities.

What I really DO like about blogs are that they allow the chance for readers not only to respond, but to extend the conversation. Readers are part of the publishing equation. If a writer depends on reader feedback, blogging’s one way to get it.

OTOH, as regards poetry, my point was that a successful poem doesn’t live or die based on public acceptance. A piece may be 50 or 100 years ahead of its time and not find an audience until then. Another piece may be poorly crafted but widely popular.

I gues I’m still trying to figure out what blogging (as opposed to a website presenting “finished” content) can do for me. I think of it as a semi-public creative writing exercise–but not a finished product. I’m still fiddling with it.

David Vincenti May 12, 2005 at 10:53 am

Robin said: “I think of it as a semi-public creative writing exercise–but not a finished product.”

Bingo. I think first and foremost, blogging is a community (“semi-public”) thing. Face it: we wouldn’t post these thoughts if we didn’t want some feedback. And my blog (and reading others’) has given me input I’d never have received – my personal/physical community lacked many of the viewpoints the blogosphere offers.

So blogging is akin to journaling and a writing group. What are the primary outputs of both these things: (1) ideas, and (2) practice. Feedback is an interesting, but secondary, element. The writing of a poem remains a solitary act – though hopefully a well-informed solitary act – in the end.

Collin May 13, 2005 at 1:33 pm

I think blogging has helped my poetry. It does keep me current and in touch. I have actually put poems in progress up on my blog and had other poets give me grief for airing my “imperfect” work. Personally, I don’t see it like that. The poems I post are usually in a middle draft and will get several more before I decide if they are possibilities for submission or if they will be stored in a notebook or hard drive for future reference. Or maybe the poem only works as a performance piece, and not on paper. My two cents.

meetu May 29, 2005 at 11:33 pm

hey guys check this one out

http://www.aquarianised@blogspot.com

Leave a Comment